Evaluation of hemostatic devices in a randomized porcine model of junctional hemorrhage and 72-hour prolonged field care.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage control in prolonged field care (PFC) presents unique challenges that drive the need for enhanced point of injury treatment capabilities to maintain patient stability beyond the Golden Hour. To address this, two hemostatic agents, Combat Gauze (CG) and XSTAT, were evaluated in a porcine model of uncontrolled junctional hemorrhage for speed of deployment and hemostatic efficacy over 72 hours. METHODS: The left subclavian artery and subscapular vein were isolated in anesthetized male Yorkshire swine (70-85 kg) and injured via 50% transection, followed by 30 seconds of hemorrhage. Combat Gauze (n = 6) or XSTAT (n = 6) was administered until bleeding stopped and remained within subjects for observation over 72 hours. Physiologic monitoring, hemostatic efficacy, and hematological parameters were measured throughout the protocol. Gross necropsy and histology were performed following humane euthanasia. RESULTS: Both CG and XSTAT maintained hemostasis throughout the full duration of the protocol. There were no significant differences between groups in hemorrhage volume (CG: 1021.0 ± 183.7 mL vs. XSTAT: 968.2 ± 243.3 mL), total blood loss (CG: 20.8 ± 2.7% vs. XSTAT: 20.1 ± 5.1%), or devices used (CG: 3.8 ± 1.2 vs. XSTAT: 5.3 ± 1.4). XSTAT absorbed significantly more blood than CG (CG: 199.5 ± 50.3 mL vs. XSTAT: 327.6 ± 71.4 mL) and was significantly faster to administer (CG: 3.4 ± 1.6 minutes vs. XSTAT: 1.4 ± 0.5 minutes). There were no significant changes in activated clot time, prothrombin time, or international normalized ratio between groups or compared with baseline throughout the 72-hour protocol. Histopathology revealed no evidence of microthromboemboli or disseminated coagulopathies across evaluated tissues in either group. CONCLUSION: Combat Gauze and XSTAT demonstrated equivalent hemostatic ability through 72 hours, with no overt evidence of coagulopathies from prolonged indwelling. In addition, XSTAT offered significantly faster administration and the ability to absorb more blood. Taken together, XSTAT offers logistical and efficiency advantages over CG for immediate control of junctional noncompressible hemorrhage, particularly in a tactical environment. In addition, extension of indicated timelines to 72 hours allows translation to PFC.

Comparison of MANTA versus Perclose Prostyle large-bore vascular closure devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: New vascular closure devices (VCD) are being introduced for achieving hemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, no safety or efficacy data have been published compared to other contemporary VCD. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of suture-based Perclose Prostyle as compared to plug-based MANTA device. METHODS: A total of 408 consecutive TAVI patients from two high volume TAVI centers were included in the present study. Patients were grouped according to VCD: Prostyle versus MANTA. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable analysis were utilized to compare clinical endpoints between the two groups. The primary endpoint was any vascular complication (VC) according to VARC-3 criteria. RESULTS: After PSM, a total of 264 patients were analyzed, of them 132 in each group. Overall baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Primary end-point was similar between MANTA as compared to Prostyle (16.7% vs. 15.3% respectively, p = 0.888). The main driver for VC among MANTA group were minor vascular complications (15.2%). Conversely, minor and major VC contributed equally to the primary endpoint among Prostyle group (7.6%) (p = 0.013). No outcome predictors were identified in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: VCD for transfemoral TAVI using the new-generation Prostyle device or the MANTA device achieved comparable VARC-3 VC rates.

Clinical outcomes of MANTA closure device in percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The MANTA device is a plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) designed for large bore femoral arterial access site closure. It showed promising results in transcatheter aortic valve replacement cases. In this study, we report our results and evaluate the MANTA VCD in percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (pEVAR). METHODS: All data of consecutive patients who underwent an elective pEVAR between October 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients at least one common femoral artery was intended to close with the MANTA VCD. Depending on the sheath size, the 14Fr or 18Fr MANTA VCD was used. On the preoperative computed tomography scan, the diameter of the common femoral artery (CFA) was measured and the amount of calcification based on the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) was scored. Primary outcome was procedural technical success. Procedural technical success was defined as placement of the MANTA closure device resulting in vascular closure with patent CFA, without requiring immediate open or endovascular surgery. The secondary outcomes were access site complications requiring reintervention and all-cause mortality at 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 152 consecutive patients underwent pEVAR with 291 common femoral artery closure procedures with the Manta VCD. Mean age was 74.1 ± 6.4 years, with a mean body mass index of 27.7 ± 4.4 kg/m2. The mean diameter of the CFA was 10.5 ± 1.9 mm. In 52.6% of the cases, there were no calcification on the preoperative computed tomography scan. The 18Fr and 14Fr Manta VCD were used 169 and 122 times, respectively. The technical success rate was 96.6%. Major vascular complications were reported in 4.5% of the cases, without any death-related events. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed the procedural technical success, major vascular complications and all-cause mortality at 30-day follow-up of the MANTA vascular closure device in 152 pEVAR patients with 291 common femoral artery closure procedures. The technical success rate was 96,6%. Major vascular complications were reported in 4.5% of the cases, without any death related events. We concluded that the MANTA device is a safe and feasible option with a high rate of technical success in patients undergoing pEVAR.

Outcomes of Preperitoneal Packing and Angioembolization for Hemorrhage Control in Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures are often life-threatening injuries; however, the optimal management remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the most appropriate primary management of hemorrhage in adult patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures by comparing outcomes following the initial use of preperitoneal packing (PPP) vs angioembolization (AE). METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and ProQuest databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing hemorrhage management in trauma patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures were included. The data extracted from selected articles included patient demographics, study design, and outcomes such as 24-hour PRBC transfusions, in-hospital mortality, and DVT rate. RESULTS: Eight articles were included in the systematic review. Among the included studies, 2040 patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures were analyzed. Meta-analyses revealed that treatment with PPP was associated with fewer 24-hour PRBC transfusions (mean difference = -1.0, 95% CI: -1.8 to -.2) than AE. However, no significant differences were noted in in-hospital mortality (RR: .91, 95% CI: .80-1.05) and the rate of deep vein thrombosis (RR: .89, 95% CI: .62-1.28) between groups. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that primary management with PPP was associated with fewer 24-hour PRBC transfusions compared to AE. The choice of primary management with PPP or AE did not significantly impact in-hospital mortality. Future studies should address clinical outcomes and the factors that affect them to better understand the impact of different management strategies and direct the creation of practice management guidelines.

Comparison of manual compression, Z-stitch, and suture-mediated vascular closure device techniques in dogs undergoing percutaneous transvenous intervention.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Manual compression has been standard of care for maintaining hemostasis after percutaneous endovascular intervention, but can be time-consuming and associated with vascular complications. Alternative closure methods include the figure-of-eight suture (Z-stitch) and vascular closure device (VCD) techniques. We hypothesized that compared to manual compression, Z-stitch and VCD would significantly reduce time-to-hemostasis after transvenous access, and the proportion of dogs with vascular patency would not differ significantly among treatments. ANIMALS: Forty-six client-owned dogs undergoing percutaneous transvenous interventional procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dogs with vessel diameter <5 mm were randomized to undergo manual compression or Z-stitch, while those with vessel diameter ≥5 mm were randomized to undergo manual compression, Z-stitch, or VCD. Time-to-hemostasis, bleeding scores, presence of vascular patency one day and two to three months post-procedure, and complications were recorded. Data are presented as median (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: In all 46 dogs, the right external jugular vein was used. Time-to-hemostasis was significantly shorter in the Z-stitch (2.1 [1.8-2.9] minutes) compared to VCD (8.6 [6.1-11.8] minutes; P<0.001) and manual compression (10.0 [10.0-20.0] minutes; P<0.001) groups. Time-to-hemostasis was significantly shorter in the VCD vs. manual compression (P=0.027) group. Bleeding scores were significantly greater at 5 and 10 min (P<0.001 and 0.013, respectively) in manual compression, compared to Z-stitch group. There was no difference in the proportion of dogs with vascular patency between groups (P=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Z-stitch and VCD are effective venous hemostasis methods after percutaneous transvenous intervention, with Z-stitch providing the most rapid time-to-hemostasis. Both Z-stitch and VCD techniques have low complication rates and effectively maintain vascular patency.

A modified chain-based sponge dressing controls junctional hemorrhage in the tactical combat casualty care simulation of pigs.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage has always been the focus of battlefield and pre-hospitalization treatment. With the increasing fatality rates associated with junctional bleeding, treatment of bleeding at junctional sites has gradually gained attention in battlefield trauma emergency care. We designed a modified chain-based sponge dressing with a medical polyvinyl alcohol sponge that can be used to treat junctional hemorrhage and tested its hemostatic efficacy and biocompatibility. METHODS: Twenty adult Bama miniature pigs were randomly divided into the modified chain-based sponge dressing (MCSD) and standard gauze (SG) groups. The right femoral artery of the pigs was shot at after anesthesia. The Bama miniature pigs were moved to the safety zone immediately to assess the condition according to the MARCH strategy, which evaluates massive hemorrhaging, airway obstruction, respiratory status, circulatory status, head injury & hypothermia. Hemoglobin and coagulation status were checked during the experiment.Among the pigs in which the inguinal hemorrhagic model based on bullet penetrating wounds was successfully established, those in the MCSD group received a disinfected MCSD for hemostasis, while those in the SG group received standard gauze in an imbricate manner to pack the bullet exit and entrance wounds to stop bleeding until the wound was filled, followed by compression for 3 min at sufficient pressure. CT scanning, transmission electron microscopy, and HE staining were conducted after experiment. RESULTS: The MCSD group showed lower hemostasis time and blood loss than the gauze group. The MCSD group also showed a higher success rate of treatment,more stable vital signs and hemoglobin level. The CT scanning results showed tighter packing without large gaps in the MCSD group. The histopathological assessments and the transmission electron microscopy and HE staining findings indicated good biocompatibility of the polyvinyl alcohol sponge. CONCLUSION: The MCSD met the battlefield's requirements of speedy hemostasis and biosafety for junctional hemorrhage in Bama miniature pigs. Moreover, in comparison with the conventional approach for hemostasis, it showed more stable performance for deep wound hemostasis. These findings provide the theoretical and experimental basis for the application of MCSD in the treatment of hemorrhage in the battlefield in the future.

Ruggedized Self-Propelling Hemostatic Gauze Delivers Low Dose of Thrombin and Systemic Tranexamic Acid and Achieves High Survival in Swine With Junctional Hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhage is responsible for 91% of preventable prehospital deaths in combat. Bleeding from anatomic junctions such as the groin, neck, and axillae make up 19% of these deaths, and reports estimate that effective control of junctional hemorrhage could have prevented 5% of fatalities in Afghanistan. Hemostatic dressings are effective but are time-consuming to apply and are limited when proper packing and manual pressure are not feasible, such as during care under fire. CounterFlow-Gauze is a hemostatic dressing that is effective without compression and delivers thrombin and tranexamic acid into wounds. Here, an advanced prototype of CounterFlow-Gauze, containing a range of low thrombin doses, was tested in a lethal swine model of junctional hemorrhage. Outcomes were compared with those of Combat Gauze, the current dressing recommended by Tactical Combat Casualty Care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CounterFlow-Gauze containing thrombin doses of 0, 20, 200, and 500 IU was prepared. Swine received femoral arteriotomies, and CounterFlow-Gauze was packed into wounds without additional manual compression. In a separate study using a similar model of junctional hemorrhage without additional compression, CounterFlow-Gauze containing 500 IU thrombin was tested and compared with Combat Gauze. In both studies, the primary outcomes were survival to 3 h and volume of blood loss. RESULTS: CounterFlow-Gauze with 200 and 500 IU had the highest 3-h survival, achieving 70 and 75% survival, respectively. CounterFlow-Gauze resulted in mean peak plasma tranexamic acid concentrations of 9.6 ± 1.0 µg/mL (mean ± SEM) within 3 h. In a separate study with smaller injury, CounterFlow-Gauze with 500 IU achieved 100% survival to 3 h compared with 92% in Combat Gauze animals. CONCLUSIONS: An advanced preclinical prototype of CounterFlow-Gauze formulated with a minimized thrombin dose is highly effective at managing junctional hemorrhage without compression. These results demonstrate that CounterFlow-Gauze could be developed into a feasible alternative to Combat Gauze for hemorrhage control on the battlefield.

Dual Suture Versus Suture and Plug Closure Devices for Large Bore Access Haemostasis During Percutaneous Access Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare a dual Proglide strategy versus a combination of one Proglide and dual Exoseal for large-bore access closure during percutaneous access endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients who underwent pEVAR at our center between January 2021 and February 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: dual Proglide (P + P) and one Proglide with dual Exoseal (P + E). The primary outcome measures were technical success and access-related vascular complications. Technical success was defined as achieving complete hemostasis without a bailout strategy. Postprocedural follow-up for access-related vascular complications was evaluated at 30 and 60 days using computed tomography angiography and ultrasonography. Severity was graded according to the Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Classification. RESULTS: Overall, a dual Proglide strategy was used in 46 patients (47.4%) with 65 groins (46.4%), and a combination of one Proglide and dual Exoseal was used in 51 patients (52.6%) with 75 groins (53.6%). The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The total technical success rate was 96.4%, and no significant differences were observed (95.4% vs. 97.3%; p = 0.870). Minor bleeding treatable through compression occurred significantly more often in the P group (CIRSE 1, 10.8% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.042). Hemostasis time, procedural time, length of stay in the hospital, closure device failure, and incidence of unplanned intervention did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: A combined Proglide and Exoseal strategy is safe and effective for large-bore access closure during pEVAR and can be considered an alternative. However, it should be supported by larger prospective studies.

Comparison of Figure-of-Eight Suture and Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure in Large Bore Venous Access Hemostasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Suture-mediated closure device and Figure-of-Eight suture are commonly used to achieve hemostasis after use of large bore venous access. Although both methods of closure are commonly used in clinical practice, a head-to-head comparison in a controlled setting has not been performed. Patients presenting to a single center for elective left atrial appendage occlusion or transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair were randomized to large bore venous closure using the Perclose ProGlide suture-based closure or a Figure-of-Eight suture closure. The patients were followed for 1 month after the procedure. Primary outcome, a composite of access site large ecchymosis, hematoma, infection, pain, need for unscheduled venous ultrasound and need for transfusion, was compared between the 2 arms. A total of 40 patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the 2 venous closure strategies. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Perclose ProGlide arm required use of more devices for hemostasis (1.5 ± 0.5 vs 1 ± 0 respectively, p <0.0001), and there was a significant difference in the cost of closure device ($367.00 ± 122.00 vs $1.00 ± 0 respectively, p <0.001). At 1 month post-procedure, the primary outcome occurred in 4 patients (20%) in the Perclose arm and 7 (35%) patients in the Figure-of-Eight arm, a difference that was not statistically significant (p = 0.48). Time to hemostasis between Figure-of-Eight and Perclose arms did not reach statistical significance (2.5 ± 2.1 vs 3.7 ± 2.3, p = 0.09). In conclusion, both Perclose ProGlide suture-based device and Figure-of-Eight closure are equally feasible and safe for patients who underwent large bore venous access. Figure-of-Eight-based closure is more cost effective.

Tourniquet, Uterine Inversion, and Placental dissection （TURIP） procedure as a novel hemostatic technique to preserve fertility for placenta accreta spectrum disorders without placenta previa.

The number of cases of placenta accreta spectrum disorder has been increasing with the increase in in vitro fertilization and cesarean deliveries. In addition, placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa is difficult to diagnose before delivery and sometimes requires a hysterectomy because of heavy bleeding. We have devised a uterus-preserving technique (referred to as the tourniquet, uterine inversion, and placental dissection procedure) for such cases. First, the bleeding is stopped by the tourniquet method, the uterus is relaxed with nitroglycerin, and the uterus is inverted to expose the adhesion site. After that, the placenta is detached by sharp dissection under direct visualization, and the detached areas are sutured, and then the tourniquet and internal rotation are released. This technique does not require advanced skills. Thus, a surgeon could avoid performing a hysterectomy and have a greater chance of uterus preservation when encountering massive hemorrhage caused by unpredictable placenta accreta spectrum without placenta previa in either cesarean deliveries or vaginal deliveries.

Lesión de Dieulafoy, ¿y eso qué es? / Dieulafoy lesion, what is this?

El sangrado gastrointestinal es un motivo de consulta frecuente, tanto en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios como en Atención Primaria. Existen múltiples etiologías que lo pueden motivar. La lesión de Dieulafoy es una causa rara pero potencialmente grave de hemorragia digestiva. Su localización más frecuente es el estómago. Clínicamente se expresa en forma de: melena, hematemesis o hematoquecia. Para su diagnóstico se pueden utilizar diversas exploraciones complementarias, como la angiografía, el angio-TC o la endoscopia. El tratamiento en casos recurrentes consiste en realizar embolización a través de un cateterismo intervencionista (AU)

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common reason for consultation, both in hospital emergency services and in Primary Care. There are multiple etiologies that can motivate it. Dieulafoy's lesion is a rare but potentially serious cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Its most common location is the stomach. Clinically it is expressed in the form of: melena, hematemesis or hematochezia. Various complementary exams can be used for its diagnosis, such as angiography, angio-CT or endoscopy. Recurrent bleeding treatment consists of embolization through interventional catheterization. (AU)

The Role for Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing in Low-to-Middle-Income Countries: A 16-Year Experience at a Johannesburg Trauma Unit.

INTRODUCTION: Preperitoneal pelvic packing for early pelvic haemorrhage control reduces mortality. Bleeding noted with pelvis fractures is predominantly due to associated venous complex injuries. More studies are advocating for angiography as first-line therapy for haemodynamic instability in pelvic fractures; however, these facilities are not in abundance in middle- and low-income countries. We hypothesized that PPP improves outcomes under these circumstances. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from the patients charts over a period of 16 years from 01 January, 2005 to 31 December, 2020. All patients over the age of 18 years who presented with haemodynamic instability from a pelvic fracture and required PPP were included. The demographics, physiological parameter in emergency department, blood products transfused, morbidity and mortality were analysed. RESULTS: There were 110 patients identified in the study period who underwent pelvic preperitoneal packing for refractory shock or ongoing bleeding. The majority (75.5%) of patients were men (n = 83). The median age was 38 years. The most common mechanism of injury was pedestrian vehicle collision (51%), followed by motor vehicle collisions (27.3%). The median ISS and NISS were 35 and 40, respectively. The median RTS in ED was 4.8(3-6.8). None of our patients rebleed after pack removal and no one needed repacking or adjunct angioembolization in our study group. The in-hospital mortality rate was 43.6% (n = 48) in patients who underwent preperitoneal pelvic packing. The operating room table mortality was 20% (n = 22/110), and the mortality rate of those who survived to ICU transfer was 29.5% (n = 26/88). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic preperitoneal packing has a role in the acute management of haemodynamically abnormal patients with pelvic fractures in our environment. In the absence of immediate angioembolization, preperitoneal packing can be lifesaving.

The Utility of Ultrasound Guidance to Improve the Safety of Closure of Antegrade Common Femoral Artery Access after Lower Limb Revascularization.

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guidance in reducing adverse event (AE) rates when using Angioseal device during antegrade lower limb angioplasty via common femoral artery access. From December 2016 to November 2022, 1,322 patients were identified, including 1,131 (85.6%) patients who underwent US-guided closure and 191 (14.4%) who underwent non-US-guided closure. Moderate AEs were encountered in 10 (5.2%) patients in the non-US-guided closure group compared to 38 (3.4%) patients in the US-guided closure group (P = .208). Severe AEs were encountered in 4 (2.1%) patients in the non-US-guided closure group compared to 3 (0.3%) patients in the US-guided closure group (P = .010). Overall AEs occurred in 14 (7.3%) patients in the non-US-guided closure group compared to 41 (3.6%) patients in the US-guided closure group (P = .029). Binary logistic regression showed that only non-US guidance was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of severe AEs (P = .008).

Testing and Evaluation of a Novel Hemostatic Matrix in a Swine Junctional Hemorrhage Model.

INTRODUCTION: In an ongoing effort to improve survival and reduce blood loss from hemorrhagic injuries on the battlefield, new hemostatic dressings continue to be developed. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of a novel silicon dioxide-based hemostatic matrix (HM) and compare it with the current military standard Quikclot Combat Gauze (QCG) utilizing a lethal femoral artery injury model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The femoral arteries of 20 anesthetized swine were isolated, and an arteriotomy was performed. After a 45 s free bleed, the wound was treated with either HM or QCG (n = 10 per group). Following a 60-min observation period, ipsilateral leg manipulations and angiography were performed. Animal survival, hemostasis, blood loss, exothermic reaction, and femoral artery patency were analyzed. RESULTS: Despite a volumetric size discrepancy between the two products tested, the survival rate was similar between the two groups (80% HM, 90% QCG, n = 10, P = 0.588). Immediate hemostasis was obtained in 50% of HM animals and 40% of QCG animals. There was no difference in total blood loss recorded between the two groups (P = 0.472). Femoral artery patency rates following ipsilateral leg manipulations were similar between the two groups (50% HM, 33% QCG, P = 0.637), with no contrast extravasation in HM-treated wounds (0% HM, 33% QCG, P = 0.206). There was no significant difference in either pretreatment or posttreatment laboratory values, and there were no exothermic reactions in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The SiOxMed HM demonstrated comparable hemostatic efficacy to QCG. The tested form of HM may be appropriate for surgical or topical hemostasis applications, and with further product development, it could be used for battlefield trauma implementation.

Vascular Complications in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Plug-Based vs Suture-Based Closure Devices.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the efficacy and safety of suture vs plug-based vascular closure devices (VCDs) for large-bore catheter management in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared the rates of vascular complications (VCs) associated with 2 commonly used VCDs in a large cohort of patients undergoing TAVR. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, all-comer, prospective registry study, enrolling patients undergoing TAVR for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) between the years 2009 and 2022. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing closure of the femoral access point using the MANTA VCD (M-VCD) (Teleflex, Wayne, PA) vs the ProGlide VCD (P-VCD) (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, IL). The main outcome measures were researcher adjudicated events of VARC-2 defined major and minor VCs. RESULTS: Overall, 2368 patients were enrolled in the registry; 1315 (51.0% male, 81.0 ± 7.0 years) patients were included in the current analysis. P-VCD was used in 813 patients, whereas M-VCD was used in 502 patients. In-hospital VCs were more frequent in the M-VCD vs the P-VCD group (17.3% vs 9.8%; P < 0.001). This outcome was mainly driven by elevated rates of minor VCs in the M-VCD group, whereas no significant difference was observed for major VCs (15.1% vs 8.4%; P < 0.001 and 2.2% vs 1.5%; P = 0.33, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing TAVR for severe AS, M-VCD was associated with higher rates of VCs. This outcome was mainly driven by minor VCs. The rate of major VCs was low in both groups.

Off-Label Use of the 8-F Angio-Seal for Closure of Greater than 8-F Common Femoral Arterial Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of >8-F access closures using 8-F Angio-Seal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines using Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases from inception until January 17, 2022. Actionable and nonactionable bleeding events were defined in conjugation with the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. Prevalence rates with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using R software version 4.2.2. Eight articles, with 422 patients, were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall groin adverse event rate was 5.92% (95% CI, 3.01-11.34). The most commonly reported adverse events were any bleeding (5.74%; 95% CI, 3.23-10.00) (nonactionable bleeding, 0.96% [95% CI, 0.10-8.30]; actionable bleeding, 2.30% [95% CI, 0.89-5.84]), pseudoaneurysm (1.18%; 95% CI, 0.49-2.81), and groin hematoma (1.28%; 95% CI, 0.23-6.79). The least commonly reported adverse events were device failure and vessel occlusion/stenosis, with rates 0.29% (95% CI, 0.01-7.41) and 0.45% (95% CI, 0.02-7.74), respectively. No studies recorded events regarding the following adverse events: mortality, infection, deep venous thrombosis, and retroperitoneal hematoma. Moreover, the results showed significant differences, based on the sheath size used, in actionable bleeding (P = .04) and the rate of need for surgical repair (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Common femoral artery access of >8-F can be effectively closed with the Angio-Seal with comparable outcomes to those of <8 F; however, larger access approaching 14 F is associated with a significant increase in morbidity. Further safety is needed, especially for the larger access sizes.